Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
1266 MMWR / November 24, 2017 / Vol. 66 / No. 46 US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
The MMWR series of publications is published by the Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027.
Suggested citation: [Author names; first three, then et al., if more than six.] [Report title]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:[inclusive page numbers].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Brenda Fitzgerald, MD, Director
William R. Mac Kenzie, MD, Acting Associate Director for Science
Joanne Cono, MD, ScM, Director, Office of Science Quality
Chesley L. Richards, MD, MPH, Deputy Director for Public Health Scientific Services
Michael F. Iademarco, MD, MPH, Director, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services
MMWR Editorial and Production Staff (Weekly)
Sonja A. Rasmussen, MD, MS, Editor-in-Chief
Charlotte K. Kent, PhD, MPH, Executive Editor
Jacqueline Gindler, MD, Editor
Teresa F. Rutledge, Managing Editor
Douglas W. Weatherwax, Lead Technical Writer-Editor
Soumya Dunworth, PhD, Kristy Gerdes, MPH, Teresa M. Hood, MS,
Technical Writer-Editors
Martha F. Boyd, Lead Visual Information Specialist
Maureen A. Leahy, Julia C. Martinroe,
Stephen R. Spriggs, Tong Yang,
Visual Information Specialists
Quang M. Doan, MBA, Phyllis H. King,
Paul D. Maitland, Terraye M. Starr, Moua Yang,
Information Technology Specialists
MMWR Editorial Board
Timothy F. Jones, MD, Chairman
Matthew L. Boulton, MD, MPH
Virginia A. Caine, MD
Katherine Lyon Daniel, PhD
Jonathan E. Fielding, MD, MPH, MBA
David W. Fleming, MD
William E. Halperin, MD, DrPH, MPH
King K. Holmes, MD, PhD
Robin Ikeda, MD, MPH
Rima F. Khabbaz, MD
Phyllis Meadows, PhD, MSN, RN
Jewel Mullen, MD, MPH, MPA
Jeff Niederdeppe, PhD
Patricia Quinlisk, MD, MPH
Patrick L. Remington, MD, MPH
Carlos Roig, MS, MA
William L. Roper, MD, MPH
William Schaffner, MD
Among the 50 busiest airports worldwide, 23 (46%) had a
smoke-free policy (Table 1). Among the top 10 busiest airports,
five had a smoke-free policy (Beijing Capital, Chicago’s O’Hare
International, London’s Heathrow, Los Angeles International,
and Shanghai Pudong International) and five allowed smok-
ing in certain indoor areas (Atlanta Hartsfield Jackson
International, Dubai International, Hong Kong International,
Paris’s Charles de Gaulle, and Tokyo International).
Regional differences were observed in smoke-free policy
status among the world’s 50 busiest airports (Table 2). Among
those in North America, 14 of 18 had a smoke-free policy; in
Europe, four of nine had a smoke-free policy, including airports
in Madrid, Barcelona, and London (Heathrow and Gatwick
airports); and in Asia, four of 22 had a smoke-free policy (all
four are in China, including Beijing Capital International
Airport, the world’s second busiest airport). The only airport
among the 50 busiest in Oceania is Sydney International,
which is smoke-free. None of the world’s 50 busiest airports
is located in South America or Africa.
Discussion
As of August 2017, nearly half (46%) of the 50 busiest air-
ports worldwide have a smoke-free policy. Smoke-free policies
substantially improve indoor air quality and reduce secondhand
smoke exposure among nonsmokers (1,2). The 2006 Surgeon
General’s report concluded that eliminating smoking in indoor
spaces fully protects nonsmokers from exposure to secondhand
smoke, and that separating smokers from nonsmokers, cleaning
the air, and ventilating buildings cannot eliminate exposure of
nonsmokers to secondhand smoke (1).
Although the airports in this analysis that do not have
smoke-free policies only allow smoking indoors in designated
or ventilated smoking areas, studies have documented that
secondhand smoke can transfer from designated smoking
areas into nonsmoking areas in airports, where nonsmoking
travelers and employees can be exposed (5–7). In addition to
subjecting nonsmoking travelers who pass through these areas
to involuntary secondhand smoke exposure, designated or
ventilated smoking areas can also result in involuntary exposure
of airport employees who are required to enter these areas or
work near them.
Since 2012, two of the five large-hub U.S. airports that
allowed smoking in designated indoor areas have implemented,
or are implementing, smoke-free policies. Salt Lake City
International, a large-hub U.S. airport that is not among the
world’s 50 busiest, closed its smoking rooms,
†
and Denver
International closed three of its four indoor smoking rooms,
with the final smoking room scheduled to close by 2018.
§
The findings in this report are subject to at least three
limitations. First, information on smoke-free policies was
based on information available on airport websites, which
could be subject to bias or be outdated. However, these data
†
http://www.sltrib.com/news/3928480-155/salt-lake-city-to-phase-out; https://
www.slcairport.com/airport-services/smoking-areas/.
§
https://www.flydenver.com/sites/default/files/downloads/DIAPR_130111s.pdf.